[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fakeroot status
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: fakeroot status |
Date: |
14 May 2002 00:21:45 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes:
> > I'm pretty sure that fakeroot should *not* override identity--for the
> > reason at least that it is *NOT* the same node.
>
> But it's pretending to be.
It is either indistinguishable, in which case it doesn't need to
exist, or it has *some* difference in semantics--any difference
whatsoever--in which case it should not share the same identity port.
Thomas
- Re: fakeroot status, (continued)
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/12
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/13
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/14
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Roland McGrath, 2002/05/15
- Re: fakeroot status, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/05/14