[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uname -s
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: uname -s |
|
Date: |
24 Oct 2002 13:17:00 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Petri Koistinen <petri@joo.ath.cx> writes:
>
> > I think uname -s should print: GNUmach.
>
> uname -s prints the kernel, but it's the "kernel" in Unixspeak, that
> is, the thing that interprets the "system calls" where the "system
> calls" are read/write/open.
According to POSIX, `uname -s' should print the "implementation of the
operating system".
--
Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: uname -s, (continued)
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Robert Millan, 2002/10/24
- Re: uname -s, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/25
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Jeff Bailey, 2002/10/29
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Robert Millan, 2002/10/31
- Re: uname -s and naming confusion, Tom Hart, 2002/10/31
Re: uname -s,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
Re: uname -s, Jon Mason, 2002/10/24