[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian
From: |
Michael Banck |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:56:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I went about this yesterday, and discovered that tetex-bin isn't usable
> in the archive.
I think I've uploaded a tetex-bin build some time ago. Does it look like
a build problem or are there bugs in the package? I guess I could try to
build the latest version this evening if necessaty, no promises though.
Anyway, patch #1606 in Savannah factors out hurd-doc, so just putting
tetex into Build-Depends-Indep and building the arch:all hurd-doc
package on GNU/Linux and the rest on GNU/Hurd might work as well.
cheers,
Michael
- [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules, noreply, 2003/06/10
- [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules, noreply, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules, Robert Millan, 2003/06/10
- Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Robert Millan, 2003/06/10
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/06/21
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Jeff Bailey, 2003/06/21
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Robert Millan, 2003/06/22
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Robert Millan, 2003/06/27
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Michael Banck, 2003/06/27
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules), Jeff Bailey, 2003/06/27
- Re: Hurd package needs an update (was: Re: [Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules),
Michael Banck <=
[Patch #1606] Overhaul debian/rules, noreply, 2003/06/11