[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A Hurd release
From: |
Rian Hunter |
Subject: |
Re: A Hurd release |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:16:59 -0500 |
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:25, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> I don't ask you to change the way you work, but to consider
> participating (at times) in something you reject to participate in.
> And nothing of this is for the sake of Savannah, but for the sake of
> this project.
>
> My bug reports have a better track record of getting fixed then any of
> the stuff on Savannah. So for the sake of the project, people should
> stop using the bug tracker.
If the topic of how well the bug database works can go on for this long,
I feel like this may be another hurdle (haha) in the HURD's development.
To the maintainers and large contributors: Would using another bug
database system that is equally usable to the group be worth
considering? I think everyone that contributes is dedicated enough to
compromise in this respect.
Many volunteer free software projects highly benefit from an effective
bug database, especially when there is a large user-base. The speed at
which a bug is discovered, and widely known as closed seems to be
important. The whole world knows this though.
Thanks for reading!
-rian
- Re: A Hurd release, (continued)
- Re: A Hurd release, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/11
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: A Hurd release, Ognyan Kulev, 2005/01/12
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/07
- Re: A Hurd release, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/07
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/07
- Re: A Hurd release,
Rian Hunter <=
- Re: A Hurd release, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/08
- Re: A Hurd release, Ayden, 2005/01/06
Re: A Hurd release, Harley D. Eades III, 2005/01/05