[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH?] GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd
From: |
Ulrich Weigand |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH?] GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:40:25 +0200 (CEST) |
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Ha, I, myself, am the GDB guru here ;-)! I had a look at the log again,
> experimented some more, and finally got it going with the following
> patch. However, I have absolutely no idea whether that is correct in all
> cases, etc. Should perhaps target_wait (a.k.a. gnu-nat.c's gnu_wait) be
> doing that?
Adding switch_to_thread at this location seems correct to me (even though
it should be a no-op on most targets).
Could you test your patch on a non-Hurd target to make sure, anyway?
> + /* TODO. How to keep this synchronized with gnu-nat.c's own counting? */
Hmm. It would appear that "set exec-wrapper" is currently broken with
the gnu-nat.c target, right?
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
- GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/10/09
- Re: GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Pedro Alves, 2008/10/09
- Re: GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/10/10
- Re: GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Pedro Alves, 2008/10/10
- Re: GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/10/11
- [PATCH?] GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/10/11
- Re: [PATCH?] GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd,
Ulrich Weigand <=
- Re: [PATCH?] GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Pedro Alves, 2008/10/13
- Re: [PATCH?] GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/10/14
- Re: GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Pedro Alves, 2008/10/11
- Re: GDB HEAD (partly) broken for GNU/Hurd, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/10/11