[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EQP
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: EQP |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:03:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Neal H. Walfield, le Thu 30 Oct 2008 13:11:58 +0100, a écrit :
> > The major problem is how to manage the pool of processors. This can be
> > implemented by doing away with the centralised scheduler and letting
> > each processor manage itself. The problem is now really one of resource
> > allocation rather than scheduling.
>
> What's the difference between scheduling and allocation?
I guess he means the difference between "I'm a processor and I just
manage the threads that have been put on my local list" and "putting
threads on per-processor lists".
Samuel
- Re: A niche for the Hurd, (continued)
- Re: A niche for the Hurd, Samuel Thibault, 2008/10/29
- Re: A niche for the Hurd, Benoit FREMON, 2008/10/29
- Re: A niche for the Hurd, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/10/29
- Re: A niche for the Hurd, Benoit FREMON, 2008/10/29
- Re: A niche for the Hurd, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/10/29
- Re: A niche for the Hurd, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/10/29
- Message not available
- A niche for the Hurd, Sergiu Ivanov, 2008/10/30
- Which niche does the Hurd fill for YOU - why do you develop for/on it?, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/10/31
- Re: A niche for the Hurd, Jason Cozens, 2008/10/30
- EQP, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/10/30
- Re: EQP,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: EQP, Jason Cozens, 2008/10/30
- Re: EQP, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/10/31