[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N
|
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
|
Subject: |
Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 May 2010 09:42:05 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
Hi,
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:10:57PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:08:10PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> The first three patches are pretty useless on their own, they all
> affect the same program, and most changes are pretty mechanical, so I
> think you might as well merge them.
Indeed -- while I support this kind of gradual changes in general, it's
probably overdoing it a bit here :-)
> I've commented on every hunk to make sure I looked through it all,
> which makes it a bit long but hopefully easy to follow (complain if it
> isn't).
Well, it certainly does make it pretty redundant...
> > +/* Deprecated. Use exec_exec_file_name instead. */
>
> A colon would be better: ``Deprecated: use ...''.
Or perhaps a semi-colon, or a dash? Punctuation can be so exciting...
;-)
-antrik-
- exec server and /dev/fd/N, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, 2010/05/24
- [PATCH] Use the new __hurd_exec_file_name RPC, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, 2010/05/27
- Re: [PATCH] Use the new __hurd_exec_file_name RPC, Carl Fredrik Hammar, 2010/05/31
- Re: [PATCH] Use the new __hurd_exec_file_name RPC, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/05/31
- [PATCH 3/3] Use the new _hurd_exec_file_name function, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, 2010/05/27