[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filen
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff] |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:55:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Zhang Cong, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 20:42:04 +0800, a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
> wrote:
>
> Again, no. Drivers can work the way they prefer. The driver
> infrastructure itself doesn't need a "bigplan", it is parts of it which
> need their own. For instance, the IRQ issue I mentioned has its plan
> by itself, and it doesn't need to interfere with the physical memory
> allocation issue.
>
>
> That's not sure, unless we have a plenty of driver works, we may need adjust
> the infrastructure for the need or some new abstract .
Yes, but that new abstract will be independant from other matters
concerning drivers.
> Although we have driver infrastructure, no enough third part driver provider
> now.
> The audio driver and video driver may be part of hurd at first ( just on
> repo's
> view), at least some high level abstract, this need a plan.
Sure. You need a plan for audio, a plan for video. But you don't need
a plan for both audio & video at the same time, except some general
Hurdish principles, but that's not big.
Samuel
- Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff, (continued)
- Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/06
- Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/06
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/06
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff],
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff], Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Justus Winter, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/07
- Re: Upstreaming patches, Zhang Cong, 2014/04/07
Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/07