|
From: | Samuel Thibault |
Subject: | Re: Confusing definitions and declarations of mig_dealloc_reply_port() |
Date: | Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:57:33 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Diego Nieto Cid, on Wed 04 Nov 2015 10:50:35 -0300, wrote: > assert (__hurd_local_reply_port == arg || arg == MACH_PORT_NULL) > > AIUI any other values are bogus given how 'mig_get_reply_port' and > 'mig_dealloc_reply_port' are meant to be paired. That's probably a good thing to do, yes. Samuel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |