[Bug-indent] HTML GNU Indent documentation

[Daniel Varlet]

Dear all,

First, thank you a lot for your work !!!!!!!!!
Second, sorry but my english is not very good.

And now a few things I notice on 
<http://home.hccnet.nl/d.ingamells/indent_17.html#SEC17>
when I trieded to understand something in the 82 options of Indent ;-)

1) In the list of "all the options for indent, alphabetized by short option" :

        `-bfda' comes after `-dn' 
        `-cdb'  comes after `-cdn'  [this can be true if  the ending `n' is 
skiped ]
        `-din'  comes after `-dn'   [this can be true if  the ending `n' is 
skiped ]
        `-lcn'  comes after `-ln'   [this can be true if  the ending `n' is 
skiped ]
        `-npro' comes after `-orig' 

missing  :
         -nbbb
                --no-blank-lines-before-block-comments

Do not prefer to break long lines before boolean operators.
See section 1.9 Breaking long lines. 

2) In the list of "options alphabetized by long option" :

In the HTML source : for some options, tabs are used instead of spaces .
An exemple :    "--no-space-after-for                           -nsaf"

missing :

        `--Bill-Shannon' `--blank-before-sizeof'                                
 `-bs'
        `--comment-line-lengthn'                                                
                `-lcn' 

incomplete:

        --brace-indent                                  -bli[N]
        
3) Some comments :
About the ending  "n" as number of some options :
Why a "n" lower case ? A "N" upper case will be more comprehensible. Especially 
for the man. This was used only once in this doc. See last exemple.

All over the documentation there is a mix with this "N". Sometime it is simply 
skiped sometimes not. I think its bad ;-)))
for exemple :

"If you use the `-bl' option, you may also want to specify the `-bli' option."
<http://home.hccnet.nl/d.ingamells/indent_9.html#SEC9>

        "bliN" !!!!

"The option `-ipN' can be used to set the extra offset per paren."
<http://home.hccnet.nl/d.ingamells/indent_11.html#SEC11>

        it's nice ;-)



Again, thanks for the work,
Regards,

-- 
Daniel