[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-indent] Oops on Nested Loops (and stuff)
From: |
Alex Clarke |
Subject: |
[Bug-indent] Oops on Nested Loops (and stuff) |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:43:58 -0500 (EST) |
New to indent. Great concept. Bad on nested blocks (at least redhat 9's
2.2.9-2 version is).
Example of problem:
input:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int i,j,k,l;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < 100; j++)
{
for (k = 0; k < 100; k++)
{
for (l = 0; l < 100; l++)
{
fprintf(stderr,"argh!");
}
}
}
}
}
indent myfile.c #default GNU style, right?
produces:
#include <stdio.h>
int
main ()
{
int i, j, k, l;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < 100; j++)
{
for (k = 0; k < 100; k++)
{
for (l = 0; l < 100; l++)
{
fprintf (stderr, "argh!");
}
}
}
}
}
and that's just not cool. The behaviour I expected was for every nested
level to be indented, not every other. Is this known behaviour or an
aberration?
Thanks,
Alex.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug-indent] Oops on Nested Loops (and stuff),
Alex Clarke <=