bug-kawa
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-kawa] [bug #20143] some GCJs can't compile gnu/lists/PrintConsumer.


From: Stephen Compall
Subject: [Bug-kawa] [bug #20143] some GCJs can't compile gnu/lists/PrintConsumer.java:74
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 02:11:59 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070208 Mandriva/2.0.0.3-2mdv2007.1 (2007.1) Firefox/2.0.0.3

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?20143>

                 Summary: some GCJs can't compile
gnu/lists/PrintConsumer.java:74
                 Project: Kawa
            Submitted by: S11001001
            Submitted on: Sunday 06/10/2007 at 21:11
                Category: None
                Severity: 3 - Normal
              Item Group: Problem building Kawa
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

I tried building from SVN trunk r5973 with gcj (GCC) 4.1.2 20070302
(prerelease) (4.1.2-1mdv2007.1), which is the current official/update release
on Mandriva 2007.  It has trouble with e.g. choosing the correct `execute'
method to call in my example file, attached to this report.

This causes r5973 to break like:

./configure --with-gcj && make
...
CLASSPATH=../..:./../..:$CLASSPATH gcj -C -d ../.. -g AbstractFormat.java
AbstractSequence.java ...
PrintConsumer.java: In class 'gnu.lists.PrintConsumer':
PrintConsumer.java: In method
'gnu.lists.PrintConsumer.write(java.lang.CharSequence,int,int)':
PrintConsumer.java:74: error: Can't find method
‘write(Ljava/lang/String;II)’ in type ‘gnu.lists.PrintConsumer’.
Candidates are:
  'gnu.lists.PrintConsumer.write(java.lang.CharSequence,int,int)' in
'gnu.lists.PrintConsumer'
  'java.io.PrintWriter.write(java.lang.String,int,int)' in
'java.io.PrintWriter'.
      write((String) csq, start, end);

I worked around it here by putting super.write instead.

I asked in irc.oftc.net/#gcj and at least gcj (GCC) 4.1.3 20070518
(prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-8) supports the construct correctly, so there may
be too small a subset of compilers to justify changing it in SVN.



    _______________________________________________________

File Attachments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sunday 06/10/2007 at 21:11  Name: MoreSpecificSuperApplies.java  Size:
476B   By: S11001001
a smaller test case for GCJ
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=13006>

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?20143>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]