|
From: | Bruno Haible |
Subject: | Re: [bug-libunistring] relicensing libunistring to "dual LGPLv3+ or GPLv2" |
Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2016 17:30:58 +0100 |
User-agent: | KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.8.0-44-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) |
> Bruno Haible proposed to change the license of the library from LGPLv3+ > to the "LGPLv3+ or GPLv2" dual license. Let me add the rationale for this proposal: 1) Support the (direct or indirect) use by GPLv2 programs. The GPLv2 license is still widely used, see [1]. 2) It fixes a disadvantage of GPL2-only applications w.r.t. proprietary or MIT-licensed software. 3) It is one of the options that RMS recommends, see [2]. Bruno [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Adoption [2] http://nmav.gnutls.org/2013/03/the-perils-of-lgplv3.html
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |