bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: doc bug(s)?/beam bug?


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: doc bug(s)?/beam bug?
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:16:24 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511

I've corrected the two typos in the documentation. For your last question,
see below.

David Bobroff wrote:

Not sure if I've spotted a documentation bug (at the very least there is
a typo), a program bug, or some of each.  Here goes:

In section 8.6.2 "Setting automatic beam behavior" it says;

#(override-auto-beam-setting '(be p q n m) a b [context])

be is either "begin" or "end".
[OK]

b/q is the duration of the note for which you want to add a rule. A beam
is considered to have the duration of its shortest note. Set p and q to
'*' to have this apply to any beam.

[Should be p/q no?]

Right!

n/m is the position in the time signature to which this rule should
apply. Set n and m to '*' to have this apply in any time signature.

[...is the position in the time signature...? Or ...is the time
signature...?  I infer from the example for 5/8 time which follows that
n/m should *be* the time signature.]

Right!

a/b is the position in the bar at which the beam should end.
[OK, I think]

So, shouldn't this code:

\version "2.7.20"

\score {
 \relative {
   #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 4 8)
   \time 2/4
   c8 c c c
 }
}

...produce a single beam across four eighth notes?  Also, shouldn't:

No, since there already are a number of settings defined by default in LilyPond,
see scm/auto-beam.scm.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]