[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug status
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Bug status |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:16:03 -0300 |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Carl D. Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Issue attribute updates:
>> Status: Verified
>>
>
>
> Valentin,
>
> I may be wrong (after all, you're the bugmeister), but I think you are using
> status codes differently than they have been used in the past.
>
> It appears that you use "Verified" when a bug is fixed. In the past, I
> believe that "Verified" means that the bug report has been found to actually
> be a bug, and that "Fixed" is used when the bug is no longer occuring.
>
> This is almost a complete reversal of the meaning of "Verified", from "It
> really is a bug, and I've demonstrated it" to "The bug has gone away".
>
As far as I can remember it was always like this. Maybe the label
name can be enhanced.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Bug status, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/06/10
- Re: Bug status, Valentin Villenave, 2008/06/10
- Re: Bug status,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=