[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue 649 in lilypond: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not vali
From: |
codesite-noreply |
Subject: |
Issue 649 in lilypond: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not valid for full bar length |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:55:40 -0700 |
Issue 649: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not valid for full
bar length
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=649
New issue report by n.puttock:
%{
An accidental on a broken tied note should be valid for
the length of the bar after the break.
In this example, the second cis in bar 2 shouldn't have
an accidental.
%}
\version "2.11.53"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 0
}
\relative c' {
cis1 ~ \break
cis2 cis
}
Attachments:
foo.PNG 11.0 KB
Issue attributes:
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
- Issue 649 in lilypond: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not valid for full bar length,
codesite-noreply <=
- Issue 649 in lilypond: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not valid for full bar length, codesite-noreply, 2008/07/19
- Issue 649 in lilypond: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not valid for full bar length, codesite-noreply, 2008/07/20
- Issue 649 in lilypond: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not valid for full bar length, codesite-noreply, 2008/07/21
- Issue 649 in lilypond: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not valid for full bar length, codesite-noreply, 2008/07/22
- Issue 649 in lilypond: Accidentals on tied notes across a break not valid for full bar length, codesite-noreply, 2008/07/22