Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

[lilypond]

Comment #18 on issue 903 by percival.music.ca: Enhancement: a more  
user-friendly way to specify notename languages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903

Thanks, Bertalan.

veryfurryfur: yes, there can be syntax changes in 2.13.9, but not in  
2.12.3.  This is
no negotiable.  There _can_ be syntax *additions*, but I don't like the  
idea of
having a \language command *and* the old \include method.  If we want to  
move to
\language (which is a good idea), then we'd remove the language definitions  
from the
ly/ dir.

The only two questions are:
1)  What will be the actual name?  (i.e. \noteLanguage vs. \language)
2)  When should this change occur?

#1 could be debated right now, but I think that GLISS is the best format to  
have such
debates.  #2 should occur when we have major other changes, namely lilypond  
3.0.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings