Re: #852 - stop google from indexing old docs

[Graham Percival]

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:12:16AM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Huh, I didn't reliaze we kept the old unstable directories
> > around; they're not listed on
> >   http://lilypond.org/documentation
> > anybody mind if I delete the unstable doc dirs?
> 
> I might mind, but I don't think I'd be able to give any good
> reason why.  I think it's kinda neat to look through an old
> manual from time to time.

Oh, we'll keep the stable docs.  I just don't think the old
*unstable* docs are worth having online.

Note that if anybody wants to do serious archeological work, they
can just grab git and compile whatever version they want.

> > or /doc/archive ?  I'll think about it.
> 
> Well, the problem with "archive" is that the latest
> development docs would be there too, because we shouldn't
> let google track those either.  "Archive" implies old, and
> the dev docs are new.

True, although it would be simple to have
doc/stable/
doc/devel/
doc/archive/

I'll test this later.

Cheers,
- Graham