bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 694 in lilypond: Enhancement: arrowed heads for microtone acci


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: Issue 694 in lilypond: Enhancement: arrowed heads for microtone accidentals
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:20:58 +0000


Comment #9 on issue 694 by percival.music.ca: Enhancement: arrowed heads for microtone accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=694

What's not clear...
- there's some patch(s), but it's not clear if it applies to current git, or is waiting for revision from the author, or waiting for review. - lilypond already supports arbitrary fractional tones. Notation 1.1.1 Non-Western note names and accidentals, in the 2.13 docs. So what's missing? Just the graphical pointed arrow? - to reduce confusion from developers and bug squad people, we only want "item" per issue. This one claims to be about documentation, but the original reporter (Valentin) didn't know about our arbitrary-fraction-microtones, and there's this patch, and now you're talking about "code solution first"...

We need somebody who cares about microtonal support (you?) to divide this up. - if anything is wrong with our fundamental support for arbitrary fractional microtones, make a minimal bug report and send it to bug-lilypond. The Bug Squad should add a SEPARATE issue for that one. - if the fundamental definitions of microtones are fine, but you want a different display mechanism (which is probably true; the Turkish notation doesn't look familiar to me), then make a minimal bug report and send it to bug-lilypond. The bug squad should add a separate issue for that graphical enhancement request. - if the patch is still good, then send it to lilypond-devel, and if nobody replies, the patch manager will add a separate issue blah blah. - if there's anything else, then send a separate minimal bug report, and blah blah.

Finally, close this issue because it's way too confusing for me. Yes, I may be an idiot, but given that it's an old issue and nobody else has looked into it, I think you need to deal with the idiot. I know this makes extra administrative work (maybe 30 minutes in total?) for people who care about microtonal stuff, but IMHO that's the best chance to move forward with this.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]