[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autobeaming in cadenza
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Re: autobeaming in cadenza |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:35:00 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri 01 Oct 2010, 13:47 Keith E OHara wrote:
> >"Mark Polesky" wrote:
> >>Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >>>I think that autobeaming in cadenzas should beam according
> >>>to baseMoment, [ ... ]
> >> The very concept of beats within a cadenza goes against the
> >>whole idea of a cadenza in the first place. [ ... ]
> >>The user will almost always need to do some manual beams.
> > Perhaps the best answer is to have \candezaOn turn off autobeaming.
>
> Keith OHara wrote
> >Even though a cadenza has a free rhythm and is not divided into bars,
> >itusually has a rhythmic structure, and is written using the usual
> >conventionsof music with a beat. Beethoven's 'emperor' concerto [ ... ]
>
>
> Just because I like closure ...
>
> The way auto-beaming 'worked' 2.12 was by accident, so the change I noticed
> with 2.13 is _not_ a bug.
>
> Opinions of correct behavior are varied, so we have _no_ enhancement request.
>
> We recommend that users manually beam in cadenzas, at least in long cadenzas.
>
>
> Myself, I make mistakes typing manual beams. In cadenzas where I want
> pattered beams, I can use \cadenzaOff\bar""\cadenzaOn at the natural breaks.
> This resets measurePosition to zero often enough that auto-beaming happens to
> 'work' and helps me find when I miss a note. I know LilyPond does not
> guarantee that behavior.
>
> The more disciplined among us can \cadenzaOn\autoBeamOff . . .
> \cadenzaOff\autoBeamOn
I've added 1289 though:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1289
Thank you.
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
Bug Squad