[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue 1300 in lilypond: Badly placed cross-staff beam, similar to Issue
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Issue 1300 in lilypond: Badly placed cross-staff beam, similar to Issue 506 |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:56:41 +0000 |
Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Collision
New issue 1300 by RalphBugList: Badly placed cross-staff beam, similar to
Issue 506
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1300
% Something like issue 506 can still be observed.
%
% Relative to the original report for issue 506,
% remove the slur, and add an accent with a
% forced direction. The beam is badly placed.
%
% I did *not* find this during normal use, but
% while testing a workaround for a different bug.
% Small changes avoid the bug. In this example, either
% move the accent, or put the slur back in.
% Maybe just file this under 506, so we know there
% are limits to that fix?
\version "2.12.3"
% version 2.13.33 gives visibly the same output
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = rh { s1 }
\new Staff = lh \relative c {
\clef bass
%
% LilyPond reports 'programming error: Grob direction
% requested while calculation in progress.'
% Inserting
% \stemDown
% removes this error report, but still produces
% a badly-placed beam, very similar to original 506.
%
e16-\markup{a}_> b'
\change Staff = rh
g' b
}
%{%}>>
Attachments:
lilybug_506.png 3.0 KB
- Issue 1300 in lilypond: Badly placed cross-staff beam, similar to Issue 506,
lilypond <=