[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.40 regtests
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.40 regtests |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:44:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 07:10:25PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Done this - comparing .39 with .40. I did a pixel-by-pixel
> comparison, allowing a leeway of 1 in pixel brightness (range is 0
> It identified 21 files with changes.
Wow, I was expecting much more! In that case, this is definitely
worth adding.
Short-term, I think it's enough if you just use it on your local
computer, and use it to identify regressions. In the medium
(3-month)-term, we'll look at adding a pixel comparison to the
official build process, somehow.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, (continued)
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/24
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/24
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Neil Puttock, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/27
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/27
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/27
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/29
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/30
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/11/26
Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/28