[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.40 regtests
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.40 regtests |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:37:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote in message
> news:address@hidden
>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> The PC is unusable when it's running - all the Ghostscript command
>>> line interfaces get in the way.
>>
>> Huh? If you see Ghostscript command line interfaces, you are calling
>> the wrong version of Ghostscript, or using the wrong options.
>>
>> For X, there is some executable called gsnd or so (Ghostscript no
>> display), but you should not really need it if the devices are already
>> set on the command line. For Windows, something like gswin32c is needed
>> (the c is important).
>
> It's not me that calls Ghostscript, it's LilyPond.
Then it shouldn't.
File a bug report and feel free to include the above hint. I don't have
Windows available, so I can't make a proper report. I know that
preview-latex had to do something like the above in order to drive
Ghostscript as a "hidden" PostScript converter.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, (continued)
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/29
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/30
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/11/26
Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/28