bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug in rest-placement in polyphonic music


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: bug in rest-placement in polyphonic music
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:02:21 -0000

<address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
"D" == Dmytro O Redchuk <address@hidden> writes:
   D> Actually, i can understand why this output is _wanted_, but can
   D> not imagine good Summary for issue report.

   D> "Rest in lower voice should be placed above notes in in upper if
   D> voices are crossed"? Or if lower voice's noteheads are above the
   D> middle line, while upper voice's stems are staring from the
   D> middle line?

   D> I am not sure that either is correct.

No, the point is that the rests belong to the upper voice, and get
pushed below a lower voice if the stem-direction of the upper voice is
flipped.  See the attached examples.

Dont know what is wanted in a "Summary for issue report", but perhaps
something along these lines:

"Place rests where the noteheads of the voice goes in the column - by
default: odds up, evens down - regardless of stem-direction of voice."

There may be reasons to not have them like this by default, but i cant
figure any places where the opposite (the current behaviour) would be
wanted (ie. in one voice: noteheads above, rests below).

-anders

Bump.  Could a bug-squadder look at this, please?

--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]