Re: Issue 1716 in lilypond: No convert-ly rule for the fix for issue 1655

[lilypond]

Comment #4 on issue 1716 by address@hidden: No convert-ly rule for  
the fix for issue 1655
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1716

So are you comfortable with a genera rule that says something like "If a  
user knows enough to play around with internal properties, they know enough  
to deal with the elimination of internal properties without us giving them  
an indication"?

I think I could be convinced of this.  If we go this way, perhaps we should  
explicitly declare that internal properties are not part of the defined  
lilypond syntax.