|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Misleading autobeaming in 3/4 |
Date: | Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:20:09 +0100 |
"Bertrand Bordage" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hiddenHi again, There's a small defect in autobeaming: %%% \markup "This:" \relative c'' { \time 3/4 a4. b8 c d e d c b4. a8 b c d c b a2. } \markup "looks like 6/8:" \relative c'' { \time 6/8 a4. b8 c d e d c b4. a8 b c d c b a2. } \markup "but should be like this:" \relative c'' { \time 3/4 a4. b8\noBeam c d e d c\noBeam b4. a8 b c d c b a2. } %%% Unfortunately, I don't think this can be easily fixed with the current system. Regards, BertrandGardner Read gives the "correct" beaming pattern for 3/4 to be 6 beamed quavers, so the implication is that any available quavers are beamed. Gotta say that seems wrong to me, but can we wait until a beaming guru comments before raising this as an issue?-- Phil Holmes Bug Squad
Stay that - I've just found the correct bit of Gould (page 153), where she's clear it shouldn't look like this (and I've seen Carl's comment). I'll raise this as an issue.
-- Phil Holmes Bug Squad
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |