Re: NR3.2.2: erroneous example?

[Jean-Charles Malahieude]

Le 20/08/2011 00:03, Trevor Daniels disait :
> Jean-Charles, you wrote Friday, August 19, 2011 3:02 PM
>
> > Since the only header fields that will be printed are piece and opus,
> > the example in "Custom text formatting for title blocks" should read
> > (line 802 of input.itely)
> >
> > - subtitle = \markup { \italic "(Excerpt)" }
> > + opus = \markup { \italic "(Excerpt)" }
> >
> > May I change it myself, or?
>
> Please do.

OK

> When this section was changed quite a lot
> of useful information was lost. I think
> the following also needs to be reinserted
> (properly formatted, of course) in Title
> blocks explained:

Since I don't like very much having two consecutive
"if" sentences, I would favor:

> -------------
If the book only has a single score, the @code{\header} block may be
placed inside or outside of the @code{\score} block.

The default behavior, when the @code{\header} has been defined inside
the @code{\score} block, is to print only the @code{piece} and @code{opus}
fields:

@lilypond[papersize=a5,quote,verbatim,noragged-right]
\score {
  { c'4 }
  \header {
    title = "title"  % not printed
    piece = "piece"
    opus = "opus"
  }
}
@end lilypond

@funindex print-all-headers
@noindent
You may change this behavior (and print all the headers when defining
@code{\header} inside @code{\score}) by using

@example
address@hidden
  print-all-headers = ##t
@}
@end example

@warning{Remember when adding a @address@hidden block inside a
> -------------


Cheer,
Jean-Charles