[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grace synchronization
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: grace synchronization |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:33:17 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Reinhold Kainhofer <reinhold <at> kainhofer.com> writes:
> The problem is what is the default for the second value (the grace moment)?
> While processing a voice like
> c4 \clef "bass" c4
> You will have to decide
> to assign the clef to either 1/4G-0 or 1/4G-inf.
The problem with 1/4 - inf G when combined with
> c4 \grace e8 \clef "bass" c4
is *vastly* less troublesome than the existing problem.
1) Grace notes before a non-note such as clef, key sig, line-break, etc.,
are rare compared with grace notes just after a non-note. (If the opposite
were true, issues 34, 1302, and equivalent would not be bugs at all.)
2) When the non-note event is distributed to other staves, like \bar or
\time and if non-notes get timing -inf G) the surprising non-standard
placement arises from \bar and \grace in the *same* musical expression.
The result would be much less surprising and easier to control.
Currently, to place a \bar "||" in the standard way requires knowledge
of the earliest grace note in all other staves -- which might not have
been composed yet.
3) When the non-note event affects only one staff (like the \clef example
above) the only problem with -inf G is vertical alignment. This might be
solved anyway depending on how we associate the duration inf*G with its
zero desired horizontal space.
Re: grace synchronization, Jonathan Wilkes, 2011/08/26
Re: grace synchronization, David Kastrup, 2011/08/26
- Re: grace synchronization, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/08/26
- Re: grace synchronization, Hans Aberg, 2011/08/26
- Re: grace synchronization, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/08/26
- Re: grace synchronization,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: grace synchronization, David Kastrup, 2011/08/27
- Re: grace synchronization, Hans Aberg, 2011/08/27
- Re: grace synchronization, David Kastrup, 2011/08/27
- Re: grace synchronization, Hans Aberg, 2011/08/27
Re: grace synchronization, David Kastrup, 2011/08/27