Re: wrong italian word in pitches-headword.ly

[Phil Holmes]

"David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote in message 
news:address@hidden
Neil Puttock <address@hidden> writes:

> On 1 January 2012 14:47, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > > If the headword explained this, it would be fine, but it doesn't and
> > > therefore makes it look wrong. We don't use other archaic words unless
> > > there's a clear reason?
> >
> > It's a real music example (of a particularly famous piece), so should
> > follow the practice of the majority of editions.
>
> It would still make sense to add a comment to that effect.
>
> --
> David Kastrup

I'd agree, but it's a headword in the manual and I'm not sure it's possible. 
As I'd said I was in the middle of LSR updates and so have changed this and 
pushed to staging.  If the consensus is that we should keep "ligato" I'll 
change it back, with apologies.

--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad