[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
footnotes and chord constructs
From: |
Federico Bruni |
Subject: |
footnotes and chord constructs |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:30:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121123 Icedove/10.0.11 |
It took me some time to understand the following:
\version "2.17.10"
\relative c'' {
\footnote #'(2 . 4) "Footnote 1" <d-3>2 % it's not printed because
of the <>
\footnote #'(2 . 4) "Footnote 2" Stem <d-3> % unless I specify Stem
}
IIUC, the grob-name *must* be specified when a footnote is attached to a
note enclosed in a chord construct.
I'm reading NR 3.2.3 and in particular:
"""
Marking an entire chord in this manner is not possible since a chord
does not produce an event separate from that of its chord constituents,
but the constituents themselves can be marked.
If the layout object being footmarked is indirectly caused by an event
(like an Accidental or Stem caused by a NoteHead), an additional symbol
argument, the grob-name, is required before the footnote text:
"""
I'm not sure if this fully explain the "problem".
What do you think?
I would also add a
@cindex footnotes and chord constructs
to help jumping directly to the explanation.
Thanks
--
Federico
- footnotes and chord constructs,
Federico Bruni <=