[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: second+ voice cross-measure slur problem
From: |
Eluze |
Subject: |
Re: second+ voice cross-measure slur problem |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:32:09 -0700 (PDT) |
Papanastasiou Spyridon wrote
> \version "2.16.2"
> \new Staff {
> <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1(}>>
> <<{\voiceOne a1}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1)}>>
> <<{\voiceOne a1(}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
> <<{\voiceOne a1)}\new Voice {\voiceTwo c1}>>
> }
>
> the first slur is not connected
I don't see what you're trying to do - can you draw an outline or scan an
example!?
here is a small example how I would write a 2-voice staff:
\new Staff <<
\new Voice {
\voiceOne
a1
a1
a1(
a1)
}
\new Voice {
\voiceTwo
c1(
c1)
c1
c1
}
>>
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/second-voice-cross-measure-slur-problem-tp148499p148501.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.