Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lessening the clarity

[James]

On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote:
> pkx166h wrote
> > On 01/02/14 09:44, Eluze wrote:
> > > in NR 2.19.1 Appendix D + E, a lot of commands are listed /with/ and
> > > /without/ the backslash - this seems unnecessary
> > >
> > > some commands - eg. \single, \temporary and \undo - are only listed
> > > /without/ backslash
> > >
> > > imo commands should always be quoted including the backslash to make them
> > > quickly recognizable as commands.
> > See first:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=855
> >
> > At least you're stepping into that territory, if only indirectly.
> thanks for the pointer!
>
> as this is already recognized and in work the other point remains:
>
> add \single, \temporary \undo and  more to the index - is that worth an
> entry in the tracker!?
>
> Eluze
A tracker? I'd just create a patch and submit it (and create the tracker 
with git-cl for that patch). Otherwise you are going to have to say 
where you want the @cindex's specifically. Seems as you know how to make 
a patch that you might as well do them and submit them yourself. I don't 
think it is ever a bad idea to have index entries.

James