Remaining lsr-snippets to approve - feed-back needed

[Thomas Morley]

Hi all,

after far to long laziness in approving lsr-snippets, I used
spring-break to go through them. Most are approved now, sometimes with
more or less heavy editing.
Though, there are few left, where I'm not sure how to deal with.
All by Pierre, thus cc-ing him.

(1)
"StaffGroup bracket with a variable length (path)"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=989

This one is obviously a construction helper and the method is used in
"Repeat-bar-lines with angle-wings for whole StaffGroup (manually)"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=991

Though, why doing all from scratch and not using brackettips.up/down from feta?
I see no point in keeping "StaffGroup bracket with a variable length
(path)" and vote for deleting it.

Side-notes:
a)
We have
"Curly bracket with variable length (path)"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=988
which indeed prints brackets different from feta, so I have no problem with it.
This method is used in
"Orchestral grouping with a custom brace"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=986
b)
Additionally I've uploaded
"Repeat-bar-lines with angle-wings for whole StaffGroup (automatic and
semi-automatic)"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1032


(2)
There are these two snippets:

Instrument name as staff lines
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=981

Instrument name as staff lines (alternative)
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=983

Both lack of description.
Which one should I approve? Or even both?


(3)
"Squeeze and split staff"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=1005

It really demonstrates the full power of the path-command.
Though, it recodes an existing image.

The original-pdf can be downloaded at
http://www.graphire.com/Pages/Framesets/framesmp.htm
click "Sample Output" -> "Fuqua"-example

Is there a copyright-issue?


(4)
"Worksheet"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=922
It demonstrates the use of markup-commands and fullfills the
snippet-description, nothing more.
Worth keeping/approving it?

(5)
"Eyeglasses as markup (path)"
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=982

It was already discussed at:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LSR-eyeglasses-snippet-td179471.html
Though again, any point in keeping it?
I'd vote for deleting it.


I'd love to have some feedback how to proceed with the above mentioned snippets.


Thanks,
  Harm