Re: NR 4.2.2, table column should be called "glyph name"?

[Simon Albrecht]

On 12.06.2017 12:06, Federico Bruni wrote:
> > Not in my opinion.  The font is feta11 (the font family is feta).  The
> > staff height is 11.22 pt.  The staff height is 3.9 mm.
>
> Hi Carl, are you sure?
> The context of my report was:
>
> commit 18d03fa6a724b0102ccc47d194209802cea02f2e
> Author: James Lowe
> Date: Sun Mar 5 16:34:39 2017 +0000
>
>    Doc - NR + CG: Clarify Emmentaler is the 'font' and Feta/Parmesan 
> are glyphs
>
>    Issue 4966
>
>    Distinguish between Emmentaler
>    the 'font' and Feta/Parmesan
>    glyphs that make up the
>    Emmentaler font family.

That is quite imprecise wording: Feta and Parmesan are subsets of the 
Emmentaler font, not individual glyphs.
Whether ‘font name’ in that NR table is also imprecise is a matter of 
little importance IMO – it’s the least confusing choice of words and I 
don’t see any need to change it.

Best, Simon