[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog
|
From: |
Jordi Mallach |
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:00:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:04:32PM +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> Do 1.0 and 1.2 here mean release numbers? If so, this seems to
> be a better scheme than `ChangeLog.yyyy'.
Yes. They do it whenever a X.x.0 version is released and the ChangeLog
is fat enough at that moment. We could just fork it with every minor
release.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
address@hidden address@hidden http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [bug-mailutils] i18n issue, Jordi Mallach, 2004/06/16
- Re: [bug-mailutils] i18n issue, Alain Magloire, 2004/06/16
- Re: [bug-mailutils] i18n issue, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/17
- Re: [bug-mailutils] i18n issue, Jordi Mallach, 2004/06/17
- [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Alain Magloire, 2004/06/21
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Jeff Bailey, 2004/06/21
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Jordi Mallach, 2004/06/21
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog,
Jordi Mallach <=
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Jordi Mallach, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Alain Magloire, 2004/06/22
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Wojciech Polak, 2004/06/21
- Re: [bug-mailutils] Breaking the ChangeLog, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/06/22
[bug-mailutils] Branching for 0.5 (was: i18n issue), Alain Magloire, 2004/06/21
Message not available
Message not available