bug-make
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
is this feature broken or no feature at all?
From
:
Verrol L. Adams
Subject
:
is this feature broken or no feature at all?
Date
:
25 Apr 2002 07:53:29 -0500
hi, i have been using the following on HP-UX with their make and clearmake (part of Clearcase) without problem:
MOD_CPP = \
${MODULE_DIR}/u_socket.o
...
${MOD_CPP}: address@hidden
@ echo "<<< Begin: Compiling $< >>>"
@ rm -f $@
@ rm -f ${@:.o=.s}
${CC} ${CFLAGS} -S ${INC_DIR} -o ${@:.o=.s} $<
${CC} ${CFLAGS} -c ${INC_DIR} -o $@ ${@:.o=.s}
@ echo "<<< End: Compiling $? >>>"
the idea here is to have the target and rule look like:
u_socket.o: u_socket.cpp
....
Any reason why this doen't work on my Mandrake Linux 8.2 i686 (P4) with GNU Make version 3.79.1?
Thanks.
.v
signature.asc
Description:
This is a digitally signed message part
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
is this feature broken or no feature at all?
,
Verrol L. Adams
<=
Re: is this feature broken or no feature at all?
,
Paul Smith
,
2002/04/29
Prev by Date:
[±¤°í] »õ·Î »ý±ä ¿µÈ°üÀ» ¼Ò°³ÇÕ´Ï´Ù
Next by Date:
Re: make doesn't handle += correctly for exported per-target variables
Previous by thread:
[±¤°í] »õ·Î »ý±ä ¿µÈ°üÀ» ¼Ò°³ÇÕ´Ï´Ù
Next by thread:
Re: is this feature broken or no feature at all?
Index(es):
Date
Thread