[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run
From: |
Martin Dorey |
Subject: |
RE: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:31:55 -0800 |
> So was this ever resolved?
I was happy with the suggestions on the thread, whatever they were, and
no-one objected.
> Did anything get into the documentation?
No. If someone were motivated enough to raise a bug, then I expect I
could find the time to dig out the old mails, apply them to the current
source and generate a patch to attach to the bug. Someone might then
commit the changes.
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:16
To: Martin Dorey
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
Subject: Re: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run
So was this ever resolved? Did anything get into the documentation?
Thanks.
- make --guaranteed-real-dry-run, jidanni, 2009/01/01
- RE: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run, Martin Dorey, 2009/01/01
- Re: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run, jidanni, 2009/01/01
- Re: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run, Philip Guenther, 2009/01/01
- Re: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run, jidanni, 2009/01/01
- RE: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run, Martin Dorey, 2009/01/01
- Re: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run, jidanni, 2009/01/01
- Re: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run, jidanni, 2009/01/23
- RE: make --guaranteed-real-dry-run,
Martin Dorey <=