|
From: | SF Markus Elfring |
Subject: | Re: Converting make rules into other file formats |
Date: | Sun, 15 Oct 2017 11:57:38 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 |
> Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then? … > Probably. Can it be that our software development resources are also too limited for mentioned tasks? > My intention was to provide profiling information by default … This is generally fine. Do any collaboration challenges hinder to achieve further improvements in this direction? > The dependency graphing feature was also present in the branches > I was planning to upstream since it allowed me to check > if the dependencies in our build system were incorrect from a logical PoV > (started with a sequential build) This information sounds promising. Did you clarify any remaining open issues with involved maintainers (in the background)? Regards, Markus
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |