bug-mdk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug-mdk] [bug #5652] Assembler shouldn't mask index field


From: nobody
Subject: [bug-mdk] [bug #5652] Assembler shouldn't mask index field
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:41:23 -0400
User-agent: Nutscrape/1.0 (CP/M; 8-bit)

=================== BUG #5652: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5652&group_id=118

Submitted by: joelh                   Project: GNU MIX Development Kit      
Submitted on: Wed 10/01/2003 at 02:41
Category:  None                       Severity:  5 - Major                  
Bug Group:  None                      Resolution:  None                     
Assigned to:  None                    Status:  Open                         

Summary:  Assembler shouldn't mask index field

Original Submission:  The assembler, in mix_ins_to_word (and 
mix_ins_to_word_uncheck) presently truncates the index field to three bits.



As far as I can tell, this serves no useful purpose.  It doesn't restrict the 
index to valid index registers, since 7 is still passed.  It doesn't restrict 
input, since index register values > 7 are modified to other values (which are 
pretty much useless), rather than generating an error.  It isn't required to 
make a valid word, since an entire byte is available in the I field.



There's an old tradition on machines similar to the MIX (such as the PDP-4, IBM 
360, etc) of holding data in unused portions of instructions, or (if you can 
wrangle it) used portions of instructions.  Or, if you don't have anything 
useful to store, then your initials.  ANDing the index field with 7 prevents 
this, and is unnecessary.



No Followups Have Been Posted


CC list is empty


No files currently attached


For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5652&group_id=118

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]