[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spam levels...
From: |
Alan Meyer |
Subject: |
Re: spam levels... |
Date: |
Sun, 12 May 2002 00:25:56 -0400 |
On 11 May 2002, at 20:44, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > about 1% of the people subscribed to this list complain about it.
>
> Perhaps the rest unsubscribe because it is easier than complaining.
>
> I think I'll follow their lead. Bye.
I'll add my complaint. I read this list out of interest, but the
spam levels are extraordinarily high and I will drop out if they get
much worse. Some days we get 100 KB or more of spams, a great time
waster on my dialup connection. The signal to noise ratio now seems
to be far less than 50% and getting worse every month.
I complained a long time ago and the general response was, there's
nothing to be done. So I didn't complain again. But I bet a whole
lot more than 1% are annoyed by the spam.
--
Alan Meyer
AM Systems, Inc.
Randallstown, MD, USA
address@hidden
- Re: spam levels..., (continued)
- Re: spam levels..., Thomas Dickey, 2002/05/11
- Re: spam levels..., Perry E. Metzger, 2002/05/11
- Re: spam levels..., Thomas Dickey, 2002/05/11
- Re: spam levels..., Perry E. Metzger, 2002/05/11
- Re: spam levels..., Gerhard Häring, 2002/05/11
- RE: spam levels..., Scott NVBell, 2002/05/11
- Re: spam levels..., Thomas Dickey, 2002/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: spam levels..., Thomas Dickey, 2002/05/12
- Re: spam levels..., Thomas Dickey, 2002/05/11
- Re: spam levels..., Perry E. Metzger, 2002/05/11
- Re: spam levels...,
Alan Meyer <=
- Re: spam levels..., Jason Evans, 2002/05/13
- Re: spam levels..., Daniel Weaver, 2002/05/13
Re: spam levels..., Mike Castle, 2002/05/20
RE: spam levels..., Jürgen Pfeifer, 2002/05/11