bug-oleo
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

One need not actually go to Syria to know whether or not it is a state s


From: Linda D. Cannon
Subject: One need not actually go to Syria to know whether or not it is a state sponsor of terrorism.
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:28:25 +0200

But instead of doing what was best for America, you did what was best
for Republican Party power.
It doesn't happen that often, but once in a while, I will get a comment
that just doesn't make any sense to me.
The Dhimmocrats are gleefully drawing up lists of Bush Administration
officials to impeach or try for war crimes, and coming up with all sorts
of idiotic legislation.

yyy

EXPLOSION!

Date: Monday, November 27, 2006
Company: CHINA HEALTH MGT NEW
Symbol: C N H C
Price: $1.44 (UP 7%! on Friday)
Projected: $8

C N H C  HAS BEGUN BOOMING! CHINA IS THE HOTTEST COUNTRY TO BE IN RIGHT
NOW! ADD  C N H C  TO YOUR RADAR!

yyy

Whatever decisions are made in elections need to be on the grounds that
it is what is best for America, so the world's opinion of our leaders be
damned. That, too, is worth a look. For example, every Monday my host
family would gather around the kitchen table to talk about sex. It was
not in his interest not to say the truth about what he himself and the
accompanying Protestant delegation saw and felt.
Perhaps, but the prospects are worse than dim.
In that respect, this is a good thing. He was against limiting awards in
lawsuits; she was for it. If that is the way it is going to be, then
let's at least have the people who are more easily seen as idiots
pushing the foolishness.
That, too, is worth a look.
I couldn't vote for Gore, but I didn't see Bush stopping the
environmentalists, either. So much good reading. For example, every
Monday my host family would gather around the kitchen table to talk
about sex. I'll get this out of the way right now. He also discusses the
Chinese military and espionage threats in general.
But instead of doing what was best for America, you did what was best
for Republican Party power. If he objects to the notion that an airline
can have "no Arabic script" as part of a customer dress code, then he
has some explaining to do. If he objects to the notion that an airline
can have "no Arabic script" as part of a customer dress code, then he
has some explaining to do.
He was against limiting awards in lawsuits; she was for it. Nor I his
money for my causes.
The only substantive political debate going on in America is on the
right.
Whatever decisions are made in elections need to be on the grounds that
it is what is best for America, so the world's opinion of our leaders be
damned.
Perhaps, but the prospects are worse than dim.
Be that as it may, two days is short enough that it is still worth
looking at some of the pre-election debate and long enough that some of
the fallout from Election Day is becoming apparent.
If that is the way it is going to be, then let's at least have the
people who are more easily seen as idiots pushing the foolishness. Be
that as it may, two days is short enough that it is still worth looking
at some of the pre-election debate and long enough that some of the
fallout from Election Day is becoming apparent.
It would be the GOP that would have the easiest time selling such idiocy
as continued racial quotas and new carbon taxes because most Americans
would not question their motives.
Today, it is the election, thanks to last night's post. As an adult, I
sometimes find myself wandering through Wikipedia.
And it was a very well-done blog, too. I no longer am going to have to
carry the water for people who I don't think deserve having their water
carried.
It was not in his interest not to say the truth about what he himself
and the accompanying Protestant delegation saw and felt. I'll get this
out of the way right now.
Perhaps, but the prospects are worse than dim. And if you find yourself
at a table where people insist on saying grace, politely insist on
saying justice when they're through. ' The question is, 'How have we
survived this long? I moderate comments, so those just don't get posted.
' The question is, 'How have we survived this long? This misintegrated
worldview could gain significant traction amongst a large segment of
Americans who aren't otherwise armed with a opposing strong rational
explicit philosophy.
After all, we were already negotiating with Iran before the elections.
John Murtha of Pennsylvania for having come forward last year to
denounce it.
John Murtha of Pennsylvania for having come forward last year to
denounce it.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]