Re: GNU Parallel Bug Reports A modest patch to support RH Enterprise 4.6

[Nigel Stewart]

Ole,

Oh thanks!

I didn't expect any controversy, but you never know.

I do understand the bugs can be easier to
keep track of, than emails are.

- Nigel

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Ole Tange <address@hidden> wrote:
> My bad. I simply missed it.
>
> It is now in git.
>
> I would probably have preferred it as a bug report in Savannah, so I
> would not have forgotten it and so I could refer to the bug in the
> check in. But there is no need to create a bug now.
>
> I am happy to see people actively using GNU Parallel on older
> distributions. That tells me that backwards compatibility is not
> completely broken :-)
>
>
> /Ole
> --
> https://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/merchandise.html
> ¿ǝsıpuɐɥɔɹǝɯ lǝllɐɹɐd ∩N⅁ ɹnoʎ pǝɹǝpɹo noʎ ǝʌɐH
>
>
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Nigel Stewart <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I noticed this patch didn't turn up in the 20120522 .tar.bz,
>> is a git patch the preferred avenue for this kind of thing?
>>
>> - Nigel
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Nigel Stewart <address@hidden> wrote:
> :
>>> parallel: Cannot figure out number of cpus. Using 1 at /my/bin/parallel line
>>> 2622.
> :
>>> diff a/parallel b/parallel
>>> 2600c2600
>>> <         $no_of_cpus = no_of_cpus_gnu_linux();
>>> ---
>>>>         $no_of_cpus = no_of_cpus_gnu_linux() || no_of_cores_gnu_linux();