[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.6.4, 1.6.5: Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled
From: |
Greg Roelofs |
Subject: |
Re: 1.6.4, 1.6.5: Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled |
Date: |
Sun, 18 May 2003 23:17:02 -0700 |
Andrew Clausen <address@hidden> wrote:
> dir_index is the problem.
Ah, thank you.
>> certainly in the case of moving or
>> copying a partition, I'd naively expect that parted could figure out how
>> to create an identically sized target partition and then do a byte-for-
>> byte copy into it. Is there something really subtle that I'm missing
>> here?
> Copying involves a resize if the target is a different size.
Moving doesn't, though, does it?
> Or you could send a patch... I'm way too busy to add dir_index support
> right now :(
I know the feeling, sigh... I'm afraid I don't really know anything about
file-system programming. Sorry.
Szakacsits Szabolcs <address@hidden> wrote:
> Wouldn't turning off dir_index (temporarily) solve the issue? From a Red
> Hat (beta) release note:
> tune2fs -O ^dir_index /dev/<filesystemdevice>
> You can then remove the indices from the directories by issuing
> the following command:
> e2fsck -fD /dev/<filesystemdevice>
> See e.g. here how to enable dir_index again
> http://www.uniqsys.com/pipermail/talug/2003-January/002189.html
That sounds like an excellent idea. I'll give it a try tomorrow when
I'm a little less sleepy.
Many thanks,
Greg
- Re: 1.6.4, 1.6.5: Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled, Shaul Karl, 2003/05/01
- Re: 1.6.4, 1.6.5: Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled,
Greg Roelofs <=
- Re: 1.6.4, 1.6.5: Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled, Greg Roelofs, 2003/05/19
- Re: 1.6.4, 1.6.5: Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled, Greg Roelofs, 2003/05/20