[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How Come?
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: How Come? |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:30:16 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 06:06:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> My plan is for having :
>
>
> parted--mainline--1.6.6 -----> bugfix branch
> |
> V
> parted--devel--1.6.7 -> parted--mainline--1.6.7 -----> bugfix branch
> |
> V
> parted--devel--1.6.8 -> parted--mainline--1.6.8 -----> bugfix branch
Is this the standard approach?
Did you mean parted--mainlain--1.6 and parted-devel--1.7 ?
I think for 1.6.x, the releases (1.6.6, 1.6.7, etc.) should be snapshots
of the branch at "suitable points", because bug-fixes only get
incorporated into the following release. (There won't be 1.6.6-bugfix1,
right?)
Cheers,
Andrew