[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sorting out the new PedUnit API
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Sorting out the new PedUnit API |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:36:21 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hi all,
It would be nice to sort out the new PedUnit API.
Firstly, the latest survey results are:
(raw data view)
Q1: AADABABCCCDC
Q2: DCEAABBDADAD
Q3: CACAAABCADAC
Q4: DDFCBECDEEAE
(histogram view)
Q1: AAAABBCCCCDD
Q2: AAAABBCDDDDE
Q3: AAAAAABCCCCD
Q4: ABCCDDDEEEEF
I attached the annotated survey.
At the moment, the primary input functions' prototypes are:
int ped_unit_parse (const char* str, PedDevice* dev,PedSector* sector);
int ped_unit_parse_custom (const char* str, PedDevice* dev,
PedUnit unit, PedSector* sector);
If we want to make some units have special semantics, we could do this
by using constraints. A rather general way of doing this would be
the following:
int ped_unit_parse (const char* str, PedDevice* dev, PedSector* sector,
PedGeometry** range);
int ped_unit_parse_custom (const char* str, PedDevice* dev,
PedUnit unit, PedSector* sector,
PedGeometry** range);
The idea is that ped_unit_parse() would return a range constraint (i.e.
a PedGeometry) that describes how flexible the user would like its input
to be treated. For units like chs, we might want to return
*range = ped_geometry_new(dev, *sector, 1);
For units like MB, we might want to make it a megabyte radius around
*sector.
In any case, I think this API is very flexible. It should allow us to
change the semantics to anything we want without any binary
incompatibilities. Any objections?
Cheers,
Andrew
survey-annotate
Description: Text document
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Sorting out the new PedUnit API,
Andrew Clausen <=