[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: partition resizing (was: Re: PedUnit API commit)
From: |
Szakacsits Szabolcs |
Subject: |
Re: partition resizing (was: Re: PedUnit API commit) |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:00:53 +0300 (MET DST) |
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Andrew Clausen wrote:
I'd still like to see resize of a partition with no filesystem.
(Patch previously submitted to maintainer(s).)
I'm not excited by the idea. Would letting the "check" command set the
partition size to coincide with the detected filesystem's size suffice?
That sounds misnomer, illogical from resizing point of view. 'Check'
suggests fsck, not resizing. Here are some scenarios. What would be the
most appropriate?
1. resize2fs|resize_reiserfs|resize_reiser4|ntfsresize
parted resize
2. resize2fs|resize_reiserfs|resize_reiser4|ntfsresize
parted check
3. resize2fs|resize_reiserfs|resize_reiser4|ntfsresize
parted align, adjust or whatever is the most expressive
Cheers,
Szaka
- Re: PedUnit API commit, Michael Reed, 2005/07/01
- Re: PedUnit API commit, leslie . polzer, 2005/07/01
- Re: PedUnit API commit, Michael Reed, 2005/07/01
- Re: PedUnit API commit, leslie . polzer, 2005/07/02
- Re: PedUnit API commit, Michael Reed, 2005/07/06
- Re: PedUnit API commit, leslie . polzer, 2005/07/06
- Re: PedUnit API commit, Andrew Clausen, 2005/07/06
- Re: partition resizing (was: Re: PedUnit API commit),
Szakacsits Szabolcs <=
- Re: partition resizing (was: Re: PedUnit API commit), Andrew Clausen, 2005/07/08
- Re: partition resizing (was: Re: PedUnit API commit), Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2005/07/08
- Re: partition resizing (was: Re: PedUnit API commit), Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2005/07/08
- Re: PedUnit API commit and partition resizing (blending "Re: PedUnit API commit" and "Re: partition resizing"), Michael Reed, 2005/07/08