[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 archite
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:31:54 +0200 |
Stephen Powell wrote:
...
> Yes, that is absolutely correct. An LDL- or CMS-format disk,
> by definition, has one and only one partition, and it is
> non-modifiable. By that I mean that the size and location
> of the partition can only be changed by reformatting the disk
> with a different block size, or for a CMS disk, by reserving
> the disk if it has just been formatted by CMS, has not been written
> to by Linux at all, and has not been reserved since formatting.
> Other than that, the partition is non-modifiable. The partition
> is writable. That is, you can create a file system or a
> swap space on it. But the size and location of the one-and-
> only-one partition cannot be changed.
>
> The end of the
> metadata (treated like a VTOC) is, by definition, the block
> which precedes the start of the first (and only) partition.
> The start of the metadata is the first block (block 0).
> The disk contains no free space, by definition.
> Formerly, start was set to 24 and vtoc_end was set to 23,
> hard coded. That is correct only for a block size of 4096,
> and for a CMS format disk, only if it is not reserved.
>
>> If you really do want to use the start sector of partition #1,
>> we can pursue that separately.
Thanks for all the explanation.
It sounds like you really do want to use that p1 start sector number.
You might want to use a new function to return that number, e.g.,
static PedSector
partition_1_start_sector (const PedDisk *disk)
{
const PedPartition *part = ped_disk_get_partition(disk, 1);
assert (part);
const LinuxSpecific *arch_specific = LINUX_SPECIFIC (disk->dev);
PedSector start = (part->geom.start
* disk->dev->sector_size
/ arch_specific->real_sector_size
/ disk->dev->hw_geom.sectors);
return start;
}
[Beware, I've just typed that in, and didn't test at all.
It might not even compile.
The computation is the same as the one done in the dasd_write loop. ]
- [RFC/PATCH 2/2] dasd: add read-only support for CMS labeled minidisks, (continued)
- [RFC/PATCH 2/2] dasd: add read-only support for CMS labeled minidisks, Jonathan Nieder, 2010/04/17
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Adam Thornton, 2010/04/17
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/17
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Stephen Powell, 2010/04/17
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/17
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Stephen Powell, 2010/04/19
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/20
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/21
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Stephen Powell, 2010/04/21
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Stephen Powell, 2010/04/21
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Stephen Powell, 2010/04/21
Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] support for CMS-formatted disks on the s/390 architecture, Stephen Powell, 2010/04/17