[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo |
Date: |
Fri, 28 May 2010 17:13:08 +0200 |
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Petr Uzel <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:00:08PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > >>
> > >> -AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.15])
> > >> +AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.18])
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this be [0.17] ? ^^^^
> >
> > Good catch. Thanks.
> >
> > That would make it match the log.
> > Would my requiring 0.18 cause trouble for you personally?
>
> SUSE, which I use on my development system, has gettext-0.17 and won't
> update it anytime soon (we are in version freeze for 11.3).
>
> So sticking to gettext-0.17 would make it easier for me, but if you
> decide to require 0.18, I'll cope with that.
>
> I think that require an update that give us no gain is bad. I'd prefer that
> 0.17
> was use until 0.18 is more commonly available in distros.
I wouldn't have suggested using 0.18 if it were for no gain.
However 0.17 is adequate, so we'll require only that, for now.
- FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo, Jim Meyering, 2010/05/26
- Re: FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo, Petr Uzel, 2010/05/27
- Re: FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo, Jim Meyering, 2010/05/27
- Re: FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo, Petr Uzel, 2010/05/27
- Re: FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo, Jim Meyering, 2010/05/27
- Re: FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo, Otavio Salvador, 2010/05/28
- Re: FYI, a few more: gettext, updates from gnulib, typo,
Jim Meyering <=