[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions
From: |
craig |
Subject: |
Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions |
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 2013 13:37:57 -0500 (CDT) |
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 13:17, "Chris Murphy" <address@hidden> said:
Thanks for responding Chris!
> On a 512byte physical and logical sector hard drive, the messages can be
> ignored.
> Alignment isn't an issue.
Wouldn't the generation of an error message, when no error condition exists, be
considered a bug? At the very least I would think it would be undesirable.
What about a 4096 physical sector drive?
> For SSDs which effectively lie about their physical sector size, the
> consequences
> of miss alignment are variable the firmware.
If mis-alignment can negatively impact performance, I would expect a documented
procedure on avoiding it. Or is my expectation out of line? I certainly
wouldn't mind helping document the procedure if I could get a clear
understanding on how what the procedure is.
>
> Chris Murphy
Sent - Gtek Web Mail
- Calculating optimal disk partitions, craig, 2013/05/08
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, Chris Murphy, 2013/05/08
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions,
craig <=
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, Chris Murphy, 2013/05/08
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, craig, 2013/05/09
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, Chris Murphy, 2013/05/09
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, craig, 2013/05/10
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, Ulf Zibis, 2013/05/10
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, Chris Murphy, 2013/05/11
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, craig, 2013/05/14
- Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions, Chris Murphy, 2013/05/14