bug-standards
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Using VC for change descriptions


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: Using VC for change descriptions
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:15:34 -0500

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > Instead, I suggest that we temporarily experiment with a real GNU
  > project: that is, we issue a special dispensation just for that
  > project, where it can try out the proposed guidelines for a few
  > months, and then we look at how well the proposal worked in that
  > project.

I don't see how that experiment makes sense.  What aspect we would try
to observe and judge?  How would we reach a conclusion?

Suppose on looking at the results I conclude that the missing ChangeLog
information was a real loss.  What they would we do to get written?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]